Some visitors to my blog are competitor agents or financial advisers. They accuse me of being biased in my views posted in this blog.
They are mistaken.
I give my honest views. I do make a judgement of what facts are fair and relevant. For example, I do not look at small investment funds, because the results are volatile. I consider them to be not suitale for long term financial planning.
Some of the large funds under NTUC Income perform slightly worse than the market. For example, our bond funds. I do not hesitate to show them, and explain why this is the case (if I know the reason).
Generally, the equity funds under NTUC Income perform well during the past three years. They earn 2% to 3% per annum better than most similar funds. I suspect that this is due to our lower charges.
Although the actual difference in charges is only 0.5% or 1%, I think that the other funds may have other charges that are not disclosed. In our case, we do NOT have any additional hidden charges.
I do not rule out that the difference could be due to the better performance of our managers. But, I think that it is mainly due to luck. In some years, certain managers may perform well, but this may reverse in other years. Over a longer period, the performance or good luck will balance out.
The low cost funds are likely to give a better return to the investors. This has been the result of many research done in America over the past decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment