FIRST POSTED ON 10 MAY 2008
NTUC Income earned an investment yield of 10.7% on the participating fund in 2007. The average long term yield (computed over the past 10 years) is 7.8% per annum.
I have two policies that are affected by the restructuring of the bonues. I calculated the yields on these policies as follows.
1. GROWTH (LG SERIES)
This policy commenced in December 2003 with a single premium of $75,000. The estimated cash value at December 2008 (5 year duration) is $85,127, giving a policy yield of 2.5%. There is a gap of 5.3% compared to the fund yield of 7.8%.
If I keep the policy to the maturity date in December 2013, the projected maturity benefit is $112,795 giving a yield of 4.2%. This is still somewhat low, giving a gap of 3.6% compared to the fund yield.
This single premium policy has low expenses and low cost of insurance. I estimate that a fair reduction in yield should be 1%. The actual gap is somewhat high.
2. LIVING (LW SERIES)
This policy commenced in October 1996 with an annual premium of $2,567. The estimated cash value in October 2008 (12 year duration) is $28,383, giving a negative yield of -1.5%. There is a gap of 9.3% compared to the fund yield.
Although a Living policy has higher expenses and a bigger cost of insurance protection, the gap appears to be excessive.
Over the next 3 years, the cash value grows by only 1.8% per annum. This is low compared to the fund yield.
I have three other policies not affected by the restructuring of the bonus. The cash value for two policies increase by more than 4% per annum over the next 3 years and by 2.8% for the Living policy.
CONCLUSION
I believe that the policies affected by the bonus restructuring have not been given a fair rate of annual and special bonuses. This has resulted in a poor policy yield, compared to the long term average yield.
Hi Mr Tan, what can we do about such discrepancies. To surrender now may seem a waste since all the upfront charges have already been paid years ago.
ReplyDeleteDear Kin Lian,
ReplyDeleteWe have been over this issue on lower than expected yield on our participating policies compared to the yield of the participating.
I think we have to bite the bullet, however hard we tell them, NTUC Income is not going to give in.
We are not getting as expected because the policy values are not computed on asset share basis based on the experience of the life fund.
There is nothing we can do that would twist NTUC Income's arm to give in to our expected return on our policies.
I wonder if you have some money to invest, will you invest in Income's Ideal Plan/Combined Funds/Growth Plan, or OCBC Class B Preference Shares (with dividends of 5.1%)?
ReplyDelete