There is a dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia about the origin of the Pendek dance and batik cloth. Indonesians write to their newspapers to complain about the use of the dance and batik in the Malaysian tourism advertisement. Some Indonesians even search for Malaysians on the roads in Jakarta to abuse them.
This matter has now been taken at top levels of the two governments, in an attempt to solve the dispute over the claim of "ownership".
Malaysia now claim that the laksa, Hainanese chicken rice and chili crab is "owned" by them. This has implication on Singapore, as they are promoted as the cuisine of Singapore.
These disputes are a sign of the times and the weakening of the moral fibre of our society. People have become too selfish and think only of their own interest, and not the welfare of others.
There is no need for neighboring countries to compete for tourists. We can work together to promote several countries at the same time. Tourists going to one country is likely to stay a day or two in a neighboring country. We need to think of "win-win", "cooperation" instead of "competition".
We need a better way to handle disputes, rather than to have the negative aspects broadcast in the media or on the streets.
Tan Kin Lian
Yes. We are getting more intense in claiming ownership, and yet forgetting that it's the food (or dance) we enjoy, rather than the ownership itself. I do hope we look for beauty at the simpler things, and stop these childish disputes. If history is really the intent, research it, for the knowledge of it, not for the ownership of it. You don't claim history either.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is that once cooperation usually comes with competition and that's the reason why we have this term called “coopetition”.
ReplyDeleteThe move by the Malaysians simply tell the world how petty they can get.
While the Pendet dance is definitely from Indonesia's Bali tradition, claims on food and even batik are frivolous. There is even Sri Lankan batik. Indonesian, Malaysian and Sri Lankan batiks have different motives and style. There is the Malay martial art, Silat which is now practised not just in the Malay Archipelago but also in Holland, and other parts of the world.
ReplyDeleteBut........one thing is for sure. The Malaysian National Anthem, Negaraku.......has similar tune with an old Indonesian song `Terang Bulan' ( Moonlight ). I still wonder why Malaysia ( Singapore was part of it too then ) would choose that, especially during the time of Konfrantasi, and Ganyang Malaysia ( Confraontation & Crush Malaysia ).
Recently, there were court cases on logos dispute between organisations as well as food sellers.
ReplyDeleteWhere is the tolerance or accommodation over such minute matter shown among fellowmen?
At regional level, it is not a big issue under ASEAN spirit.
ReplyDeleteAt main street, it is an issue.
Source of the problem:
- politician
- media
- unemployment
Chiang Mai Batik
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfF5VoATjwQ&NR=1
TKL: "Where is the tolerance or accommodation over such minute matter shown among fellowmen"
ReplyDeleteYou have created "RED'. Congratulation !
If name it "McRED", what may happen?
All the best to your new venture.
McCurry vs McDonald
ReplyDeleteWhat was the outcome in Malaysia?
Why don't better spent the legal cost for better use?
There are no real news to report. Global economy is improving. The man on the street in Asia is perfectly fine. He may not have a job, but life is still wonderful. There is food and shelter.
ReplyDeleteSo the media needs to hunt, create or provoke ideas that stirr the emotion.They love to report drama. It sells.
McCurry won the lawsuit. The argument is that "Mc" means Malaysian Chicken.
ReplyDeleteThe recent Malaysian claims of food origins is not aimed at or against international cooperation or dispute, but it's a domestic political agenda. In their last GE, of Chinese components of UMNO, Gerakan was practically wiped out by DAP and MCA was roundly thrashed.
ReplyDeleteNotice that the claims are coming from an MCA Minister aimed at the Chinese voters. The dishes highlighted are all Chinese dishes, including Hainanese chicken rice and even bakkutteh. No Malay dish is mentioned. There's no serious intention in international contention for these food title rights, just a political show that MCA is doing something and working for Malaysian Chinese. They run out ideas and have nothing better to do.
Correction:
ReplyDeleteGerakan and MCA are Chinese component parties of BN, not UMNO. UMNO is the Malay component and leading party of BN.
Vincent........
ReplyDeleteShe also mentioned Nasi lemak. That is a Malay dish.
Can S'pore claim that Johor is part of S'pore? No, right?
ReplyDeleteSo what M'sian Tourism Minister claim now is totally baseless, only pleasing to her lost voters but piss off tourists from S'pore and Indonesia.
With this kind of penny wise and pound foolish minister, no wonder MCA lost a big deal in its last GE 2008.
Sobri:
ReplyDeleteYes, you're right, but nasi lemak is not exclusively Malay, like say bakkutteh is exclusively Chinese. Both Malay and Chinese (especially peranakan Chinese) have their own nasi lemak versions.
Back to the topic of cooperation, particularly international cooperation. I think that is not well advised in her deliberation. If she emphasized on the likes of Penang laksa, Pasang bakkutteh, Muar otak etc. she could have come across as more sincere about promoting local food without offending Singaporeans and Indonesians. However, I guess that it's part of Malaysian political culture taking occasional but calculated jibes at their neighbours to score domestic points and distract attention from domestic failings.
ReplyDeleteIt is very difficult to draw a line on cultural heritage. For exmaple, in Malaysia and Singapore, the culture derives from Chinese, Indonesian, Indian, Persian, European and eastern european (:o) etc.
ReplyDeleteIn Bali, for casual visiotrs, you might think that Balinese are decendants of Indian because of the dances and costume they wear. Indonesian culture were influenced by India through Indian merchant and follow by Middle East and then by European and Chinese.
So, there is no way you can claim ownership for a particular dish or dance if they have been around for hundreds of years.