I met Ms Jaslyn Go. She told me that she was charged for distributing flyers on a National Day. Other people distributing flyers were not charged. On my request, she gave me more details of this event.
I wonder what type of campaign or cause is subject to an offence under the Act. What about a campaign against ill treatment of animals? Or to promote a Green Earth?
Ahhh ... the infamous Misc Offences Act. This was once the most used Law by policemen who still wear shorts, against hooligans, miscreants, small-time troublemakers, noisemakers, human fighters, dog fighters, homeless people, vagabonds, those who like to appear naked at the windows, etc.
ReplyDeleteMany of us can still remember advice given by our parents that are actually part of this Act. E.g. no spitting in public places, writing on walls or pasting notices on walls, carrying knives in public, touting, use vulgar language at people or worse, at civil servants etc.
Best part is many of the offences presume that the accused is guilty, and that the accused must prove his innocence.
The only part that even remotely can be used against Ms Go is Section 13B -- causing Harassment, Alarm or Distress by displaying writings, signs or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting. This is one of those offences whereby Ms Go must prove her innocence.
So any pro-PAP joker upon seeing pamphlets being distributed, can call the police and complain that he is Alarmed & Distressed by the insulting contents of the pamphlets, and that he has been Harassed by those people into taking the pamphlets.
The police will then be complying with the law by taking up action and investigation into those people.
You can read the full Act (which is quite funny) at the AGC Statutes Online.
http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/
In recent years, the members and the supporters of the SDP have been made examples of the unreasonable (and illegal) intolerance by the PAP government for an active opposition party. To SDP's credit, they have stayed true to democracy for Singapore.
ReplyDeleteComing back to the Miscellaneous Offenses Act, it is partially superceded by the Public Order Act 2009. According to the POA 2009, ANY public campaign (with one or more persons) is disallowed unless a permit is granted.
How can the POA 2009 be effectively enforced? Well, obviously it cannot be enforced, given the MHA's admission in parliament that the police is short-handed. In any case, supported by history, the police intends to enforce selectively and the AGC intend to prosecute selectively. So far, this means anyone identifiable with SDP.
This situation makes a mockery of the "rule of law" and holds the Constitution and the People in abject contempt. The greater danger is the continual suppression of political challengers to the status quo.
The question is , is the police a public employee or an employee of the ruling party? Then the pay should come from the ruling party and not from taxpayers.The police is supposed to keep law and order for the country and not the body guard and terror tool of the ruling party.
ReplyDeleteAlot of ppl are distributing flyers nowadays. How do we know whether they are legal or not? Just ignore everyone that is distributing flyers?
ReplyDeleterex comments as follows,
ReplyDeleteDear Mr Policeman,
Please, can you most kindly arrest all those property agents who themselves or by proxy, stuff junk mail into my mail box?
TKL, please don't act blur ley. Everyone knows what purpose(s) the MOA is tailored for.
ReplyDeleteYou wonder what type of campaign or cause => is it relevant at all?
ReplyDeleteAnd do you wonder at all => is it who is the person committing the offence that is more relevant?
agreed with 7.17pm. kL, you know what the Act is for. It is for those who disagreed with the force to be so dont act blur linking the Act to other causes!
ReplyDeleteHey 2.31pm, 7.17pm,
ReplyDeleteThe act is for preventing a freak election result!