The results of the Wisdom of the Crowd should be interpreted with common sense.
Some of the topics are politically inclined and the voting will be biased according the the participants.
Many of the participants are likely to be anti PAP but I have also observed the actions of members of the IB (i.e. the internet brigade set up by a rich political party). They have a way of rounding up their gang to cast their votes in favor of the PAP.
There could also be other participants who are unbiased, i.e not pro-PAP or anti-PAP.
There are other topics that do not have any political overtones. They are likely to reflect the preferences of the people at large. For example, topics on how to improve the education system, reduce cost of living or give better job security.
It also depends on how the choices are framed. I try to give options that gives choices for all possible sides of the spectrum.
I may not be perfect. But I try my best to be fair in framing the choices.
Some people will criticize the choices are not comprehensive. That is their opinion. They are free to create their own poll.
Some people will criticize the framing of the question or choices unfairly. Their purpose is primary to defame this website. I delete their comments.
I will interpret the results with some caution, i.e. knowing that there would be bias due to the inclination of the participants. I find the results to be quite illuminating.
I like to thank the regular participants for your contribution.
Some of the topics are politically inclined and the voting will be biased according the the participants.
Many of the participants are likely to be anti PAP but I have also observed the actions of members of the IB (i.e. the internet brigade set up by a rich political party). They have a way of rounding up their gang to cast their votes in favor of the PAP.
There could also be other participants who are unbiased, i.e not pro-PAP or anti-PAP.
There are other topics that do not have any political overtones. They are likely to reflect the preferences of the people at large. For example, topics on how to improve the education system, reduce cost of living or give better job security.
It also depends on how the choices are framed. I try to give options that gives choices for all possible sides of the spectrum.
I may not be perfect. But I try my best to be fair in framing the choices.
Some people will criticize the choices are not comprehensive. That is their opinion. They are free to create their own poll.
Some people will criticize the framing of the question or choices unfairly. Their purpose is primary to defame this website. I delete their comments.
I will interpret the results with some caution, i.e. knowing that there would be bias due to the inclination of the participants. I find the results to be quite illuminating.
I like to thank the regular participants for your contribution.
A mortal purist often fails to see the evil in them, but is quick to judge others. When some people criticizes others and if we look more closely, you'll realise that the critic did not get his way, or his views are not being easily swayed. If they genuinely cared for others, they will look for ways to help others succeed. A kind act may even lift their self-worth.
ReplyDelete