Han Fook Kwong wrote an article in the Sunday Times: Time for Singapore and Malaysia to discard old stereotypes.
KL's moves since May 9 polls raise hopes that the country will become a more just soceity based on rules of law.
In the long term, a Malaysia that is doing well, is stable and democratic and governed by competent people based on the rule of law is good for Singapore. A Malaysia that is divided, full of racial tension and always on the verge of the next political crisis is bad for Singapore.
I agree with Han Fook Kwong. Wholeheartedly.
The buiding of a relationship based on trust and friendship with the new government in Malaysia can start with a phone call.
It will be a call made by our finance minister Heng Swee Keat to his counterpart in Malaysia, Mr. Lim Guan Eng. Mr. Lim had said in an interview with Channel New Asia that he hope Singapore can help Malaysia to cope with debt.
Mr. Heng can ask - how can Singapore help?
Mr. Lim will probably bring up three areas:
a) Can Singapore waive the penalty of 500 million ringgit (SGD 150 million) for the cancelation or deferment of High Speed Rail?
b) Can Singapore return the CPF savings of Malaysians who have returned to work in Malaysia?
c) Can Singapore give a long term loan to Malaysia on favorable terms of repayment.
If I were the finance minister of Singapore, I would agree to the first two requests. They will not be costly to Singapore. It will be helpful to Malaysia and can be the start of a relationship based on trust and friendship.
However, I would not be able to agree on my own. I will suggest to Mr. Lim that Dr. Mahathir can call Lee HL to confirm the agreement.
There will be no need for any "package deal" for these two items. The agreement will be based on trust and friendship.
If Malaysia needs Singapore to help on the third item, the discussion will be more difficult. What is the favorable term that Malaysia would like to have and how much will it cost Singapore?
Would Malaysia be prepared to offer some benefit to Singapore in exchange - such as the extension of the water agreement, the sale of sand and use of air space?
But I would decouple this difficult discussion from the earlier items that are not costly, and would help to build a good relationship.
What are your views?
Tan Kin Lian
KL's moves since May 9 polls raise hopes that the country will become a more just soceity based on rules of law.
In the long term, a Malaysia that is doing well, is stable and democratic and governed by competent people based on the rule of law is good for Singapore. A Malaysia that is divided, full of racial tension and always on the verge of the next political crisis is bad for Singapore.
I agree with Han Fook Kwong. Wholeheartedly.
The buiding of a relationship based on trust and friendship with the new government in Malaysia can start with a phone call.
It will be a call made by our finance minister Heng Swee Keat to his counterpart in Malaysia, Mr. Lim Guan Eng. Mr. Lim had said in an interview with Channel New Asia that he hope Singapore can help Malaysia to cope with debt.
Mr. Heng can ask - how can Singapore help?
Mr. Lim will probably bring up three areas:
a) Can Singapore waive the penalty of 500 million ringgit (SGD 150 million) for the cancelation or deferment of High Speed Rail?
b) Can Singapore return the CPF savings of Malaysians who have returned to work in Malaysia?
c) Can Singapore give a long term loan to Malaysia on favorable terms of repayment.
If I were the finance minister of Singapore, I would agree to the first two requests. They will not be costly to Singapore. It will be helpful to Malaysia and can be the start of a relationship based on trust and friendship.
However, I would not be able to agree on my own. I will suggest to Mr. Lim that Dr. Mahathir can call Lee HL to confirm the agreement.
There will be no need for any "package deal" for these two items. The agreement will be based on trust and friendship.
If Malaysia needs Singapore to help on the third item, the discussion will be more difficult. What is the favorable term that Malaysia would like to have and how much will it cost Singapore?
Would Malaysia be prepared to offer some benefit to Singapore in exchange - such as the extension of the water agreement, the sale of sand and use of air space?
But I would decouple this difficult discussion from the earlier items that are not costly, and would help to build a good relationship.
What are your views?
Tan Kin Lian
Agree with Mr. Tan.
ReplyDeleteDun repeat what LKY did when Tun M asked him for a soft loan during the Asian Financial Crisis by rejecting Tun.
Unfortunately Singaporeans never learn. Very surprising our Transport Minister Khaw, who is formerly a Malaysian, fired the first shot, "we are entitled to compensation if the other Party contravenes the terms", knowing well Malaysia is short on dough, like rubbing salt into wound, so a very insensitive remark.
$150m is a very small price to pay for neighbouring ties, as compared to Temasek and GIC losing $B in overseas investments.
Dun know how much CPF moneys of Malaysians are held back, but some Malaysians told us they are happy their savings have appreciated much due to ex rate. Many want their savings back, it's an ethical issue.
Cannot only talk money, could affect ties.
We are lucky, Tun first approached Japan for money, Singapore should do
something also. Can spend 20m for Summit, Tun would say why not do something for me also.