Tuesday, November 09, 2010

Quantitative Easing - impact on Singapore

Someone asked for my views about the impact of quantitative easing on the Singapore economy. I must confess that I am not an economic expert but I believe that most economists are also unsure about the likely impact of these measures.

My own views are pessimistic, as expressed in this article about the Global Economic Turmoil. The low interest rate, stimulus package and quantitative easing adopted in America is causing asset bubbles around the world. In the short term, stock markets and property prices have shot up, but these are likely to cause a lot of problems in the months ahead.

America hopes to create more jobs with these measures. They expect the jobs to be created with the recovery of economic growth. I expect that these measures will fail to create the jobs, due to globalization, wide disparity of income, uncertainty of the future and other factors. If America goes into a double dip recession, it will reduce demand for the rest of the world and cause problems in the emerging countries that depend on consumer demand in America. It does not make sense to ask give money to a debtor to spend.

The long term solution is an economic system that can provide jobs for everyone who is willing to work. This will not come with the current economic structure, which is based on competition. It requires a new approach to distributing the work opportunities in a fair and regulated market, which will continue to be a free market in giving choice to workers and employers. My ideas are contained in this article on Creating Employment.

In the short term, the asset markets are booming, due to cheap money. You can join the party for the fun. But, like all bubbles, the pain has to come afterwards.

Tan Kin Lian

3 comments:

Unknown said...

I agree with your views on the Global economy although these things have a curious way of unfolding. Regarding creating jobs, I wonder how much of jobs can be created globally when productivity increases through technology over the years actually requires less of a workforce. Many jobs are lost over the decades, like stenos, secretaries, even lift attendants and jagas, and these jobs will never appear again.


Global population is growing, that is putting a strain on food and resources. Maybe its nature's way of slowing all this down when the birthrate of a densely populated country like Japan and Singapore drops.

Just like to know your take on technology and how jobs can be created against this backdrop.

Cheers

Tan Kin Lian said...

Hi StevenLoke

I agree with your view that higher productivity means less workers are required.

My concept is that the available work should be fairly distributed among those who are willing to work and have the appropriate skills. It means less working hour for everyone ... instead of competiting for the shrinking work opportuniities.

It means more time for leisure, hobby and family.

We need a new and better economic system.

Unknown said...

Thanks, I think I grasp your concept of distribution of work. Such a shame that the top echelons are saddled with multiple ministerial functions and dozens of directorships. Diminishing returns in theory.

Blog Archive