We spend tens, maybe hundreds of million dollars on big IT initiatives, but do not seem to get them to work?
I think that our approach is wrong. We just want to be "leading edge" in technology. It is better to be "leading edge" in common sense applications. For example, if the government decide to use email for official correspondence, it would go a lot of good to get the nation to be "smart".
They have a paranoid fear that email could be hacked. So what? In most cases, the emails are not top secret. Even physical mail can be hijacked during the delivery, right?
http://www.tankinlian.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?ID=1319&Name=A-mixed-report-card-for-Smart-Nation-initiatives---Today-paper&Type=H
I think that our approach is wrong. We just want to be "leading edge" in technology. It is better to be "leading edge" in common sense applications. For example, if the government decide to use email for official correspondence, it would go a lot of good to get the nation to be "smart".
They have a paranoid fear that email could be hacked. So what? In most cases, the emails are not top secret. Even physical mail can be hijacked during the delivery, right?
http://www.tankinlian.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?ID=1319&Name=A-mixed-report-card-for-Smart-Nation-initiatives---Today-paper&Type=H