I believe that the issuer or trustee of a structured product has a fiduciary duty towards the investors. A break of fiduciary duty is a criminal offence. I searched for an explanation of fiduciary duty and found the following:
The fiduciary duty is a legal relationship of confidence or trust between two or more parties, most commonly a fiduciary or trustee and a principal or beneficiary. One party, for example a corporate trust company or the trust department of a bank, holds a fiduciary relation or acts in a fiduciary capacity to another, such as one whose funds are entrusted to it for investment. In a fiduciary relation one person justifiably reposes confidence, good faith, reliance and trust in another whose aid, advice or protection is sought in some matter. In such a relation good conscience requires one to act at all times for the sole benefit and interests of another, with loyalty to those interests.
“ A fiduciary is someone who has undertaken to act for and on behalf of another in a particular matter in circumstances which give rise to a relationship of trust and confidence.”
A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of care at either equity or law. A fiduciary (abbreviation fid) is expected to be extremely loyal to the person to whom he owes the duty (the "principal"): he must not put his personal interests before the duty, and must not profit from his position as a fiduciary, unless the principal consents. The word itself comes originally from the Latin fides, meaning faith, and fiducia, trust.
In English common law the fiduciary relation is arguably the most important concept within the portion of the legal system known as equity. In the United Kingdom, the Judicature Acts merged the courts of Equity (historically based in England's Court of Chancery) with the courts of common law, and as a result the concept of fiduciary duty also became usable in common law courts.
When a fiduciary duty is imposed, equity requires a stricter standard of behavior than the comparable tortious duty of care at common law. It is said the fiduciary has a duty not to be in a situation where personal interests and fiduciary duty conflict, a duty not to be in a situation where his fiduciary duty conflicts with another fiduciary duty, and a duty not to profit from his fiduciary position without express knowledge and consent. A fiduciary cannot have a conflict of interest. It has been said that fiduciaries must conduct themselves "at a level higher than that trodden by the crowd" and that "the distinguishing or overriding duty of a fiduciary is the obligation of undivided loyalty."
- ► 2013 (302)
- ► 2012 (1270)
- ► 2011 (1873)
- ► 2010 (2369)
- ► 2009 (1655)
10/05 - 10/12
- Distributor: UOB Kay Hian
- Social responsibility to Singaporeans
- Speaker's Corner - 11 Oct 2008
- File an affidavit to support your claim
- Rebuilding the Global Financial System
- High cost of life insurance at older ages
- Class action against Lehman Brothers in USA
- Is MAS at fault?
- Unhappy with bank's complaint handling process (3)...
- Hong Kong - selling of structured products
- MAS publishes timeline for Minibond resolution pro...
- Climate of fear and intimidation
- Risky to trade on leverage
- Feedback on complaint handling process
- Difficulty with travel insurance claim
- Lehman Bond Probe Widens
- ST Index approaching 1900
- Petition has been lodged
- How the market really works
- Hong kong: Curb on banks' investment sales aired
- Complaint to MAS against a financial institition
- SCMP - DBS offers full compensationto mini-bond ho...
- Fiduciary duty
- HKMA vs MAS
- Global Financial Crisis - subprime loans
- Get information from my blog
- Book on financial planning
- Unhappy with bank's complaint handling process (2)...
- Bank agree to buy back risky investments
- No personal investment in credit linked securities...
- Media interviews on Petition
- Call for investors to take the next step
- Unhappy with bank's complaint handling process
- Financial institution fined for mis-selling
- Oversight of the complaint handling process
- Misleading advertisements
- Hong Kong: Minibond investors demand full refund
- Restrict the issue of credit cards
- Petition to Singapore Government - 983 signatures
- HKMA investigates complaints of alleged mis-sellin...
- South China Morning Post: 2003 case sets precedent...
- New type of foreign talent
- Poor payout on Anticipated Endowment policy
- Is bond fund risky?
- Legal fees - action against distributor
- Credit default swaps - who benefits?
- Coordinated interest rate cuts
- Reduced bonus under Income policies
- Dividend under STI ETF
- Credit default swap
- Full particulars of investors of credit linked sec...
- Hong kong - minibond buyback proposal
- File a police report
- Securities Investors Association of Singapore (SIA...
- Consumer Association
- Collective Action against specific distributors
- Unable to give individual advice or attend to indi...
- Monetary Authority of Singapore - Consumer Complai...
- ST Index is still falling
- Lodge your complaint with the Distributor
- Write to Monetary Authority of Singapore
- Meet the Member of Parliament
- My blog passes 500,000 visitors on 6 Oct 2008
- Petition to Singapore Government - Credit Linked S...
- Expensive to battle in court
- Consumer banking sells the structured products
- Loss of retirement savings
- Speaker's Corner, Saturday 11 October, 5 - 7 pm
- Section 199 of the Securities and Futures Act
- Section 27 of the Financial Advisers Act
- Request for help from Relationship Managers
- Petition on Credit Linked Securities, Singapore
- Capital protected product
- Service to the people
- CNBC short video on Minibond
- Is it wise to cash out on the structured product n...
- A highly risky structured product
- Selling of life insurance through multi-level
- Engaging a lawyer
- Elderly get hit the most!
- ▼ 10/05 - 10/12 (80)
- ► 2007 (1803)
- ► 2006 (696)
- ► 2005 (159)