Last week, a leading newspaper had a headline that suggested that a prominient entrepreneur (a multi-millionaire) based in Singapore, is sued for fraud.
This created an impression among a few knowledgeable people that this entrepreneur is acting dishonestly.
I pointed out that the suit was taken by a private individual. The circumstance of the dispute is under litigation.
It was unfair of the newspaper to use a headline that created a wrong impression among the general public.
It is a different matter, if the case is taken by the public prosecutor. The prosecutor has a duty to carry out some investigation to be satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to press a case.
I urge the public to be careful about reading the headlines, especially if there is a tendency for some newspaper to be sensational or negative. Do take a more generous view about people who may be charged or sued unfairly.
Monday, October 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(635)
-
▼
July
(75)
- Idling ships clog up Singapore shores
- Logic9 (Sudoku pocket books)
- Rebuttals to editorial in Straits Times
- Issues not addressed by MAS investigation findings...
- Law Suit on DBS High Notes
- Coverage of Lehman cases in Hong Kong
- MySudoku Contest in MyPaper
- A fair solution to the toxic product crisis
- Part Time Work Portal
- Name the Shape Contest
- TKL Intelligence Quiz Contest
- The Standard:Ip supports banks' offer in minibond ...
- Relevance of Animal Farm
- Tyranny and liberty
- Cheyenne does Shape Quiz (2)
- SCMP:SFC does not need to complete all minibond in...
- SCMP:Chief keeps quiet over calls for his resignat...
- A Doctor by Choice, a Businessman by Necessity
- Ban on selling structured notes
- Let your views be heard
- Gathering at Speaker's Corner, 22 Aug at 5 pm
- Section 27 of Financial Adviser's Act
- A fair compensation
- Follow up action on MAS investigation report
- The Standard:Illegal Lehman protest targets Tsang ...
- Singapore bars 10 firms from selling structured no...
- MAS Investigation Findings
- 100 fun and information personality quizzes
- Simplify Internet Banking
- Prevent Mis-selling of Financial Products
- Funds Transfer
- Diverse Views
- A poor return on savings in life insurance
- A note of encouragement
- No-fault motor insurance
- Are we over-reacting to Influence A (H1N1)
- The hidden ugly side of Singapore
- Consumer Finance Protection Agency
- SCMP:Lehman investments recouped
- FISCA Research: Interest Rates on Savings Accounts...
- Cheyenne does the Shape Quiz (T Puzzle)
- Allow lawyers to act on contingency fee
- Automated car
- Gathering in Speaker's Corner in August (4)
- Mis-representation on Credit Linked Notes
- Can you solve these 4 shapes?
- Checks and balances
- ATE (After The Event) Insurance
- Credit cards availabe in Singapore as at 15 May 20...
- Fixed deposit interest rate as at 15 May 2009
- Is this negligence?
- Local Transport Service
- Create jobs to help recovery of Global Economy
- SCAM: A bounced cheque
- Request for another Petition to MAS
- Show of support?
- The Standard:New deal to settle minibond buyback
- Was there an attempt to cheat?
- Gathering at Speaker's Corner in August (3)
- Best use for electric car
- Invest in Singapore Government Securities
- What is cheating?
- Politics of Fear
- Australia: List the names of underlying securities...
- Best fixed deposit rates
- SCMP:Minibond victims try to storm bank in protest...
- MRT train lines to come under a single operator
- Cheating and negligence
- Vista Plan (from Zurich)
- Administration of Justice (2)
- Gathering in Speakers Corner
- Compensation should not solely be based on vulnera...
- SCMP:Policy chief expects march to reflect increas...
- Buying a property - facilities
- Administration of Justice (1)
-
▼
July
(75)
2 comments:
I do not agree that "it is a different matter, if the case is taken by the public prosecutor." There can be many reasons -- such as corruption, incompetence, or political pressures -- that we may want to distrust public prosecutor too.
I am not saying the current public prosecutor to be distrustful. But, I think we shouldn't differentiate.
In *all* cases, it has to be innocent until proven guilty in the courts. To apply different standards based on whether it is Lee Kuan Yew or Random Person X that is suing is doing a disservice to our legal system.
I agree. Sometimes the justapositioning of the story can also create negative impression even though the contents may not be untrue.
Reporters need to be responsible in their reporting. Stories must not be slanted to sensationalise and sell the newspaper.
Post a Comment