Thursday, July 02, 2009
Vista Plan (from Zurich)
Only 3 policyholders replied to my survey on the Vista plan. I have given the contact details to these respondents to contact each other, and decide on their action.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1558)
-
►
November
(157)
- Emergency jobs program
- Location map - fast and easy
- Keynesian Economics
- False wealth
- Get Ready for Half a Recovery
- EPL matches for 2010
- Buy term insurance directly through internet porta...
- Termination of Living Policy
- Life insurance can serve a useful purpose
- Payout under CPF Life
- Family Income Benefit
- Keep cash, and be safe
- New immigrant's loyalty to Singapore
- An alternative to the free market economy
- Confucianism
- Pension planning
- Economic problems of Ireland
- Dubai is unable to repay its debts
- Ideals of communism
- Communism - theory and practice
- Misleading arguments by life insurance agents
- Watch out for signs of a bad financial adviser
- Review of existing life policy
- SCMP:Objections to new rules on minibonds look fli...
- Over reliance on ratings
- Tax burden around the world
- Level the playing field
- Survey: EPL matches on Pay TV
- Quality of service
- Loss of human touch
- Lending to small businesses
- Zero interest rate
- Common Sense Investing - John Bogle
- Credit card bills
- Recession and opportunity to change
- Excellent train service in UK
- Oligopoly
- New York Times to Goldman Sachs
- Low interest rate
- Motley Fool
-
▼
July
(192)
- Great Eastern Announces One-time Redemption Offer ...
- SCMP:Investors set for legal fight over lost milli...
- Features of life insurance policies
- Coops in focus in US healthcare debate
- Aging, inequity and poverty
- Expensive car park in Singapore
- Health care realities
- The Health Debate: At a Fever Pitch
- Permits required to appeal to the public for funds...
- Petition to PM on credit linked note (6)
- Pelosi lashes out against insurance companies
- Promote the use of car sharing
- No parking space in HDB estates
- Online Donation towards Gathering on 22 August
- Waiting for the stockmarket to bottom
- BBC; Car insurance premiums rising
- Are you sure democracy cannot help you financially...
- 50% compensation for Minibond
- Company Y not wanting to pay out my insurance clai...
- Gathering on 22 August at Hong Lim Park (2)
- Books and puzzles
- The Standard:Bank wiped out my $260m
- NJ sues Merrill Lynch over $300 mln stock purchase...
- Work near your home
- For the benefit and welfare of the people
- Honesty in Politics
- What is the future for this country?
- Free market - success and failure
- Reuters: Investors dump brokers to go it alone onl...
- NY Times: Of banks and bonuses
- Lehman victims international/ planning for Sep. 15...
- Why markets can't cure health care
- The Standard:61pc of minibond investors undecided ...
- TODAY:We should follow HK's example ; Protect indi...
- Honesty and fairness
- SCMP:Monetary Authority director clarifies minibon...
- Advice on individual shares
- Pensioner Health Benefits
- Interest rate on 25 July 2009
- Winners of Intelligence Quiz and Name The Shape co...
- Develop your mind
- SCMP:Lehman inquiry to call SFC chief again
- Broadcast this message: Petition
- Cheated in a good reputation country
- Where the jobs are
- Health care systems around the world
- Journalists refused to cover the Petition
- Unsightly flyover in the center of town
- Pinnacle Notes - many series in trouble
- CPF Life - does it need to be compulsory?
- SCMP:Minibond decision heartens investors similarl...
- The Standard:Protests ease, investors come to term...
- China Daily:Investors continue minibond fight
- Parliament Answers to Lehman Structure Products - ...
- SCMP:Some sympathy for the devils
- CPF Life
- Coverage of HK settlement
- Minimum wage spurs optimism and debate
- The Emperor's Clothes and Singapore
- SCMP:How swift lobbying ended a dispute that had d...
- SCMP:Legco inquiry to proceed despite agreement on...
- SCMP:The right rules, and the facts to invest prud...
- The Standard:Deal tones down minibond anger
- The Standard:Nightmare nears end
- Blog: Diary of a Singapore Mind
- Help Minibond investors to secure the collateral
- Petition to Prime Minister (5)
- Survey Results: The Emperor's Clothes
- Interesting puzzle
- Q&A US Health Reform
- In South Korea, a new worker's grievance
- SFC, HKMA and 16 banks reach agreement on Minibond...
- The Petition is NOT a futile effort
- Gathering in Hong Lim Park on 22 Aug 09
- Minibond - misconceptions and unfair criticisms
- NY Times: Temasek scraps plan for American chief
- SCMP:Investors want full refund, not 70pc
- Bloomberg: HK banks agree to repurchase Lehman Min...
- Investing in gold
- Investing in a property for rental
- Bird Nest Industry in Kedah, Malaysia
- Personal accident insurance
- Existing whole life policy
- Winners of MySudoku contest
- A Collosal Failure of Common Sense
- Petition to Prime Minister (4)
- NMP Siew Kum Hong expresses his views on the credi...
- SCMP:Treat us the same as minibondvictims, say Oct...
- The Standard:Banks facing China claims
- Kedah, Malaysia
- Petition to Prime Minister (3)
- Financial invention vs Consumer Protection
- SCMP: Clear up the mess
- 6 day detox programme (3)
- TODAY: On the issue of responsibility
- MySudoku Contest 17 July
- Petition to Prime Minister (2)
- Shape Quiz book is now ready
- 6 day detox programme (2)
- When do you say the Emperor has no clothes
- SCMP:Cleaning up the mess after a big player falls...
- SCMP:Tsang's disapproval rating at record high
- Earthquake and tsunami
- Singapore GIC, Temasek, and Transparency
- 6 day detox programme
- True cost of life assurance
- Financial consumers need new watchdog: Obama admin...
- The New Paper:The real problem? Underwriters hidin...
- Petition to the Prime Minister
- MySudoku Contest 10 July 2009
- Logic9 (Sudoku pocket books)
- Maximise shareholder value
- Low interest rate
- Tiered interest rate
- Ask for investigation report through FIDREC
- The Emperor's Clothes
- Brain Workout in The New Paper
- Serangoon North HUDC Privatisation
- Idling ships clog up Singapore shores
- Rebuttals to editorial in Straits Times
- Issues not addressed by MAS investigation findings...
- Law Suit on DBS High Notes
- Coverage of Lehman cases in Hong Kong
- MySudoku Contest in MyPaper
- A fair solution to the toxic product crisis
- Part Time Work Portal
- Name the Shape Contest
- TKL Intelligence Quiz Contest
- The Standard:Ip supports banks' offer in minibond ...
- Relevance of Animal Farm
- Tyranny and liberty
- Cheyenne does Shape Quiz (2)
- SCMP:SFC does not need to complete all minibond in...
- SCMP:Chief keeps quiet over calls for his resignat...
- A Doctor by Choice, a Businessman by Necessity
- Ban on selling structured notes
- Let your views be heard
- Gathering at Speaker's Corner, 22 Aug at 5 pm
- Section 27 of Financial Adviser's Act
- A fair compensation
- Follow up action on MAS investigation report
- The Standard:Illegal Lehman protest targets Tsang ...
- Singapore bars 10 firms from selling structured no...
- MAS Investigation Findings
- 100 fun and information personality quizzes
- Simplify Internet Banking
- Prevent Mis-selling of Financial Products
- Funds Transfer
- Diverse Views
- A poor return on savings in life insurance
- A note of encouragement
- No-fault motor insurance
- Are we over-reacting to Influence A (H1N1)
- The hidden ugly side of Singapore
- Consumer Finance Protection Agency
- SCMP:Lehman investments recouped
- FISCA Research: Interest Rates on Savings Accounts...
- Cheyenne does the Shape Quiz (T Puzzle)
- Allow lawyers to act on contingency fee
- Automated car
- Gathering in Speaker's Corner in August (4)
- Mis-representation on Credit Linked Notes
- Can you solve these 4 shapes?
- Checks and balances
- ATE (After The Event) Insurance
- Credit cards availabe in Singapore as at 15 May 20...
- Fixed deposit interest rate as at 15 May 2009
- Is this negligence?
- Local Transport Service
- Create jobs to help recovery of Global Economy
- SCAM: A bounced cheque
- Request for another Petition to MAS
- Show of support?
- The Standard:New deal to settle minibond buyback
- Was there an attempt to cheat?
- Gathering at Speaker's Corner in August (3)
- Best use for electric car
- Invest in Singapore Government Securities
- What is cheating?
- Politics of Fear
- Australia: List the names of underlying securities...
- Best fixed deposit rates
- SCMP:Minibond victims try to storm bank in protest...
- MRT train lines to come under a single operator
- Cheating and negligence
- Vista Plan (from Zurich)
- Administration of Justice (2)
- Gathering in Speakers Corner
- Compensation should not solely be based on vulnera...
- SCMP:Policy chief expects march to reflect increas...
- Buying a property - facilities
- Administration of Justice (1)
-
►
November
(157)
3 comments:
I am a client of Zurich, having taken out their Vista plan in 2005. I am VERY SATISFIED with this plan and I know its workings.
I work in IT Sales, so as a fellow salesman I feel I must speak for the financial adviser’s who have advised me since I took it out.
I see negative feedback on this blog (and others) - unfortunately the way of the world. I came across these whilst searching for a link to send my colleague.
If you have a bad meal in a restaurant, you’re more likely to tell people than if you have a good one. I would like to break with this tradition as the Vista plan has been a satisfying “meal” for ME.
I'm originally from the UK but have lived and worked in Dubai, Hong Kong and now Singapore since 2003. The IT company I work for produces accounting software for financial services companies. YES I am aware that the financial services industry makes tidy profits from its customers (as do lawyers and dentists).
I sat down with a financial adviser in late 2004 (in Dubai) as, after 12 months of being away from the UK, I realised I'd made no pension contributions since leaving. I was earning more money than when I lived in the UK but was also spending all my surplus. I needed a review of my financial planning but mostly someone to instill savings discipline into me. I contacted a friend who was a financial adviser in the UK and he recommended a former colleague of his who was in the same line in Dubai.
After reviewing my current planning and future plans, he recommended Life and Critical Illness coverage (I have 2 young children, a mortgage and my wife is a full time mother so this was an easy decision) as well as the Zurich Vista plan to use as a retirement vehicle. I was given a number of glossy brochures and told to read them and highlight any areas where I had questions. The benefits for MY NEEDS were explained (disciplined saving, a portable product, flexibility in savings amounts, multi currency and ease of management). On top of this I was to get a bonus in the first 12 months.
We met 2 weeks later, I asked questions about the premiums paid in the first 18 months (I was slightly uneasy about these being secured in the plan until the end date). Keith (the adviser) explained that the benefits (discounted entry into the investment funds being the clincher) were my “private banking” type reward for maintaining this minimum balance throughout my 24 year relationship with Zurich. He clearly explained that this was long-term planning and not designed for someone saving over a 2-3 years. I had a few other questions about making the monthly payments from my Sterling bank account in Jersey which he answered and I became a Zurich client.
I left Dubai in July 2007 and Keith put me in touch with a colleague in his Hong Kong office who helped me set up a HK bank account (where my salary would now be paid) and also on how to change the payment method on the Zurich plan to come from this account. This was seamless and free of charge.
I stayed in HK for 14 months before I moved to Singapore to set up our office here and again I was referred to an adviser locally in Singapore. I was now paid in Singapore and set up a Giro to pay premiums on the Zurich plan. Again free of charge. I recently rebalanced my portfolio (I selected 2 funds my bank were marketing) and entered these at 100% investment (the bank were offering 97.5% investment).
In the 4+ years I have held my Zurich plan I have been impressed with both the product and the advisers I have worked with. The product does as I was told and read and I have never heard anything (from 3rd parties) that I wasn’t aware of. It does have it’s charges (nothing in this world is free) but they are less than 1.5% p.a. on average. For the benefits I get, I’m more than happy with the costs.
The product may not be right for everyone but it was right for ME. I was fortunate enough to deal with reputable advisory firms who were accountable for their advice.
Don’t believe everything negative you read and hear.
D. Allen
Opposing View and Attention!: Am glad to hear that others have fared well (so far) with Zurich Vista.
Not everyone (my friend included) was fully explained to, that if a payment is missed during the first 18 months, the plan value is ZERO! Yes, zero. Zilch.
My friend was retrenched after paying less than 18 STEEP payments. He was eventually given a 3 month deferral on installments, however, the penalty for missing a monthly payment is so high (found only in the small, confusing print - not explained to him verbally), he would NEVER have agreed to those terms over the duration of the plan nor would he KEEP putting his money into that sort of (unethical) plan.
My friend is the long process of trying to get HIS money back based on the lack of "fairness, transparency, and ethics".
Tan, my friend suspects the reason there aren't more anti-Vista commenters is the high pressure that the governing body (the 1st line of defense when trying to resolve a financial dispute) puts on Confidentiality. It's like a Catch-22.
Perhaps there are MANY more victims reading this in search of an answer, but who are afraid to comment because of the breech-of-confidentiality fallout.
Good luck to my friend and many more in his shoes.
-Your Friend
I would have to disagree with the opposing view - why would Zurich leave themselves open to potential complaints. I'm sure they have their compliance/legal teams who are paid to ensure the appropriate level of transparency is there for clients.
I'd further disagree on the grounds that a product sold in regulated jurisdictions (both HK and Singapore I believe) has to jump through the hoops the regulator puts in place to ensure the "man on the street" knows what they are entering into. This is because the regulator doesn't want the complaints.
I'm sure there are complaints that rule in favour of the complainant BUT on the flip side I'm sure there are complaints that go no further than, "I'm sorry, you purchased this in good faith (signed and saw x, y and z worded toward the "man on the street") and now your circumstances have changed you CANNOT hold your financial adviser and/or Zurich accountable."
Post a Comment