Monday, April 01, 2013

Instant Car Pool ready for testing


Good and bad points of National Service

Stanley Loh Chong Keng asked:

Mr Tan, about NS in Singapore. If I insist you provide one good point of NS, what will you give and why? And if I also insist on you giving a bad point of NS, what will you give also. Thanks!

REPLY
Good point - as told to me by many parents. NS helps to instill the discipline in your sons. The parents cannot control them - so they are happy for the SAF to control them.

Bad points - there are several:
1. Disrupt the tertiary education
2. Place Sgns at a disadvantage compared to foreign workers
3. Delay marriage by 3 years, leading to the decline in birth rate
4. Too long, time wasted doing non-productive duties
5. Instill bad habits - smoking, switch off (but not apply to all NS men)

Singaporeans are not zenophobic

Lovecraft RavenEve said:

I am tired of people saying that singaporeans are xenophobic. Let's look at Hongkong after the 1997 handover as example.

Hongkong has merged with china for the past 16 years. both consist of ethnic Han people but relations are strained between the 2. there are frequent protests in Hongkong because of the unreasonable behaviour of the PRCs e.g. hoarding of milk, education.

what makes them think that we can integrate with the new citizens (pinoys, PRCs, indians etc) within 10 years???

Please read through the comments of Hongkongers against PRC infesting their land!!!!! they do not mince their words like singaporeans! we singaporeans have been very ke qi/ polite already!!!!!!

if what the HongKongers are doing is Xenophobic and morally wrong, why hasn't any NGOs or United Nations or Human Rights group berated them???

https://www.facebook.com/itstimetosayno?ref=ts&fref=ts&filter=1


COMMENT BY TKL
Lovecraft said that, compared to Hongkongers, Singaporeans are more tolerant of foreigners.


Be a policeman

Hi Mr. Tan
I am turning 17 and starting my first year in Poly soon. Will I be able to lead a comfortable life in the future with the pay of a diploma holder? 
Because of the high cost of living, I do not think it is possible for me to own a flat . 
Many people strongly emphasize on further studies to get a degree and earn a higher pay. However, I do not like studying.
I like to sign on with Singapore police force or the military directly after my studies. Many people told me I will have no future being in the uniformed service and if I would find it difficult to work outside after leaving the uniformed service. But my passion is in this field. What should I do?

REPLY
I encourage yoU to follow your passion, and be a policeman or soldier. The advantage is that other people do not like the job, so you have less competition.
If you focus on the job and develop the skill, you can do well. Anyone who has special skill in a job will be appreciated. Do not worry that people are on top of you because of a paper, because when it comes to the crunch, there are many people with paper, but few will real skills.
Never be discouraged and develop a negative attitude. Always be positive, and you will do well.
Wish you all the best for the future.

Friday, March 29, 2013

Conversion of sales employees to independent contractors

Someone asked me:
Income insurance agents are having problems with their employer and its union. What are your thoughts on it?


http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/03/28/do-union-leaders-of-sieu-have-communication-problems/

REPLY
Before I joined NTUC Income in 1977, the sales people were already treated as employees and were eligible for CPF and other employee benefits. 


As employees, they were also allowed to join the trade union. They were able to raise issues to the management through the union. Although difficult at times, these issues could be resolved with goodwill on both sides.

All along, we had treated the commission and bonus earned by them as income, and were subject to CPF contributions and income tax. The incentives given under sales contests were treated as non-income, as they were credited as "points" to be used for the purchase of sales items to be given away to clients. These incentives were relatively small at that time.

I believe that this treatment must have been reviewed with IRAS over the years, and was not aware about any formal objection raised by them.


I understand that the current management of NTUC Income had decided to change the employment status of the sales employees to "independent contractors" following a recent objection raised by IRAS on under-declaration of income which probably referred to the treatment of the sales contest incentives as non-income. 

Even if IRAS were to object to this treatment now, it was possible for the management to start declaring these incentive payments as income, without having to change the status of the sales people as employees. 


I am not aware if there were other reasons to change the status of the sales people and if there were other grievances arising from the change.

I can understand that some of the old timers would probably liked to remain treated as employees, rather than "independent contractors". There are advantages to them of being represented by a trade union who can speak for them collectively and give them a sense of security against unfair dismissal.

I hope that they can resolve the dispute with the management without having to incur the expenses of litigation, which must be a heavy financial burden for them.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Unacceptable fees for using cheques

PRINTED IN THE STAR ONLINE, MALAYSIA

BANK Negara's proposal to increase the cost of using cheques from 15 sen to 65 sen beginning April 2014, is unwarranted and should be withdrawn.

Though Bank Negara wants to encourage consumers to use electronic banking, it is premature to do so as online transactions too have their limits.

Firstly, there is the question of safety and reliability.
Is it safe to transfer large sums of money online?


Losses in Internet banking due to fraud was RM3.2mil in 2012. When more are forced to use online transfer the figure will go up.


From experience we know how difficult it is for consumers to fight the banks when something goes wrong with electronic transfer of money.


The banks invariably reply that their system is running smoothly and the loss has to be borne by the consumers.


Secondly, not everyone is Internet savvy while others do not have access to the Internet.
When consumers feel comfortable with transferring money online, they will automatically start doing so because of its convenience.


Until then, it is not fair for consumers to be penalised for using cheques. 

S.M. MOHAMED IDRIS
President, Consumers Association of Penang

Metropolitan Museum of Art's entrance fee 'deceptive'



 
The main lobby of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York  19 March 2013
About six million people attend the New York museum annually
 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art's practice
of requesting a 'recommended' admission fee of $25 (£16)
deceives patrons entitled to pay as little as they choose,
a lawsuit charges.

The lawsuit, filed in New York City on behalf of former patrons,
contends that the world famous museum, which receives six million visitors a year,
uses misleading marketing and cashier training to deceive unwary visitors.

A former employee of the Met may testify, alleging that
cashiers were trained to encourage visitors to pay the full fee by saying things like
'you must realise it is very expensive to run the museum'and that signage was changed from 'suggested' to 'recommended'because administrators believed it would encourage people to pay more..
 
 

Museum admission fees help fund operations


 
IN HIS letter last Saturday
("Offer free museum entry to all"),
Mr Tan Kin Lian suggested making museum entry free for all,
including foreign visitors.
 
... by continuing to charge foreign visitors general museum admission fees,
and charging both local and foreign visitors for special exhibitions,
our museums will be able to offer
high-quality exhibitions in a sustainable manner for all to enjoy.
 
Indeed,there are many museums in other countries that provide
free entry to residents, and charge fees to foreign visitors.
 
Yeo Whee Jim
Director
Arts and Heritage Division
Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth
 

MY COMMENT
I wrote to Yeo Whee Jim

Dear Mr. Yeo

Thank you for replying to my letter in the Straits Times.

You may have missed my point. I felt that the amount collected from visitors might not justify the money spent to employ people to collect the fees.

Can I ask for a breakdown on the following:

a) How much is spent yearly on staff salaries and other cost to collect admission fees?
b) How much is collected as admission fees from visitors

Prudent steps to a healthier hospital bill


 
 
Some prudent steps can be taken
to bring healthcare costs down.
 
First,
patients must not think that if they are insured,
it is okay not to check hospital bills or query about the bill,
especially at a private hospital.
 
Second,
we must educate healthcare practitioners to be more ethical,
and not take advantage of insurance coverage
by asking patients to do unnecessary tests.

Hefty MediShield premiums an improvement?



... many in the 61-65 age group are not working
or working at subsistence level.
How will they continue to afford the premiums,
as the top-up is a one-off assistance?

MY COMMENT
If they cannot afford the Medishield premium, they will find the private Shield, which 
cost 3 to 4 times of Medishield, to be even more unaffordable.

Claim process needs fixing



THE General Insurance Association of Singapore's reply
("Report accidents to insurers"; yesterday)
to Ms Wendy Ang Kweng Gee's letter
("Left in the lurch over car insurance claim"; Monday)
gives rise to more questions
about the effectiveness of the insurance industry in such cases.

Reporting all accidents may not be a good idea



... a leading workshop advised me not to file unnecessary reports,
especially for claims that were unlikely to succeed,
such as those for hit-and-run accidents by unknown culprits.
 
I was also warned about the anticipated long-drawn claim process
against foreign-registered vehicles.
 
I was told that making too many reports
could result in insurers categorising one as a high-risk driver,
and raising the insurance premium.
 
Also, why are accident reports by third parties
not communicated promptly to the parties involved,
unless one asks for them?
 

A Sincere Statement


Let it be clear that the Opposition and their supporters are not a bunch of crazies who want trouble and nothing. Like all Singaporeans, we want to live in a healthy, happy environment, and are also willing to work hard for it. We also want to see prosperity, peace and stability.

The difference is that we know that to enjoy all these, there needs to be a significant shift in the way our country is run, in the way our policies are implemented and our politics played. Real stability, real peace, real prosperity are what we are looking for. And that cannot be at the expense of our individual citizens. 

The days of the old empire must be put aside. The light of enlightenment must befall our shores. The dream we want to achieve will come and must come in order for us, all of us, to sleep in peace at night and thrive in the mornings.
It is not about dismantling what need not be dismantled. It is about replacing what should be. It is about building a new world, a safer, fairer, better world, for people to live in. 

It is as much about patriotism as it is about the dignity shared by all mankind. It is as much about economy as it is about society and welfare. It is as much about material as well as emotional things. 

We must spread the message, that we come with love, with a desire to better Singapore, with inclusivity and compassion, strong will and big hearts. 

We are not petty little people, or noisy nuisances. We will make a big impact, be a big voice and lead the big example for the change of tomorrow. 

We will..' -via The New Era

Sgc Ommoner

Car hit from behind


Letter in ST forum. 

LAST July, my car was hit from behind by another car.
I reported the accident to the insurance firm-designated workshop, thinking I could go ahead with the repairs.
However, half a year passed with no progress. The workshop said the insurance company was sitting on the claim.
When I called the insurance company, it said the other driver never reported the incident, so it could not proceed with the claim. I made a police report but the police said they would not take action as there was no injury.
I later found out that the other driver and I had policies under the same insurance company.
Is this the way an insurance company acts on claims? Is there a loophole somewhere?
My car was damaged but I cannot receive compensation even though it was not my fault.
The insurance company asked me to claim on my own insurance or go to a lawyer, for which I would have to cough out more money. I am at my wits' end.

MY VIEW
When you meet with an accident, report to your insurance company and let them handle the repair and recovery from the third party. Don't try to get your workshop to make a third party claim - as you may face this difficulty. If you make a claim on your own insurance policy, you will lose the No Claim Bonus (up to 30% only). If the accident is obviously the fault of the other party, a good insurance company may allow your NCB - so look for a good one.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Seek appropriate health care


22 March 2013

Editor
Forum Page
Straits Times

The Minister of Health wants to review the health care system to make it more affordable to the public.  I wish to bring forward the following issue for his consideration in this review. 

When a person gets old, say beyond 80 years, some organs are likely to fail, or cancer will creep in. It is a matter of time before they have to say goodbye. There is nothing much that can be done to "cure" the illness. Even if expensive treatment is carried out successfully, other parts of the body will fail. This is 
described as "complications".

Treatment has its risks. some people die earlier due to the treatment. If they are untreated, 
they might, in some cases, live longer and have a better quality of life for their remaining months.

Trying to treat old people, and often with unsuccessful results, is the source of escalating health care 
costs in many countries, including Singapore. Using private medical insurance or increasing the public funding to pay for these expenses is not the solution. We need a more sensible approach towards this issue. 

Some types of treatment should be encouraged and other types should be discouraged, and these rules 
should be made by medical experts who do not have any vested interest.

If the family receives impartial and proper advice on what can and cannot be treated, they will save a lot of pain and anguish for their elderly parents and also avoid spending a lot of money on futile treatment in the mistaken belief that they are doing the best for their parents. 

This will also stop the country from wasting a lot of resources that can be put to better use.

Tan Kin Lian

Bon Appetit


Sunday, March 24, 2013

Making life difficult for the public


Read this document to understand the trouble that the public has to go through to submit an online application to a government agency. The people who design the websites are most inconsiderate, and waste a lot of time of the public with pages of unnecessary and misleading information, and breaks up their forms into many web-pages with a high risk of wrong navigation, browser error and internet connection issues. 

I have sent this letter to the Acting Minister for Manpower. 

I experienced similar difficulties with many government agencies. They follow the same approach - make life easy for themselves and give "hell" to the public. 

http://tankinlian.com/Admin/File.aspx?ID=781&Frame=1

Seminar on Population White Paper, 23 March 2013

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Are credit card charges too high?



19 March 2013

Editor
Forum Page,
Straits Times

You have printed three letters on 19 March regarding credit card
surcharge, "Cab firm right to take a stand", "Enforce fair trade
practices", and "Budget carriers profiteering via convenience fees".

They continue arguments on the party that should bear the credit card fees. 

I like to ask the question, "why should the credit card charge be 
as high as 3 to 5% of the transaction ? " For an transaction of $500, the 
charge can be $25.

I know that the card issuer, which is usually a bank, carry the credit risk. 
But they do have the means of checking which customers have
sufficient balances in their bank account, and do not merit this charge.

Perhaps these banks are profiteering at the expense of the
merchant and their customers?

I understand that the Association of Banks (ABS) is introducing the Online
Giro by the end of this year. I like to ask if this new facility allow 
customers to make online payment, without having to incur this high
charge for use of credit cards?

As the ABS is an association representing the interest of the banks, I 
like to ask the Monetary Authority of Singapore to give their comments 
as well. 

Perhaps MAS should also comment on whether they have a 
role to ensure that credit card charges are fair to consumers?

Tan Kin Lian
President
Financial Services Consumer Association

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Free entry to museums

16 March 2015


Editor, Forum Page
Straits Times

The National Heritage Board collects an annual admission 
revenue of $2 million and spends $151 million to maintain 
the museums during the last financial year. 

The Acting Minister of Culture, Community and Youth has
announced that his Ministry plans to provide free entry to 
museums for Singaporeans and permanent residents.

I suggest that free entries should be provided to everyone, 
including tourists and non-residents.

I suspect that the amount of admission fees that can be 
collected from these sources will probably not cover the
cost of the employees who are involved in collecting and
accounting for the revenue. 

Tourists spend a lot of money when they visit Singapore. 
Why ask them to pay a few dollars in admission fees?

Many countries provide free entry to museums and do not
attempt to differentiate between residents and non-residents.

Tan Kin Lian

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Paying road tax electronically


This letter is sent to LTA, DBS and MAS. It shows my experience in paying road tax electronically. The process is extremely troublesome. To use a crude word, IT SUCKS.
http://tankinlian.com/admin/file.aspx?id=780&IID=787

Cost of medical treatment


The cost of medical treatment may not be as expensive as most people feared.
http://tankinlian.com/admin/file.aspx?id=778&IID=785

Why life insurers make so much profit

A former colleague went to work for an international insurance group that has a successful operation in Singapore and other countries in Asia. 

He told me, "Mr. Tan, the business of this company is so profitable, that you will be surprised. They can make a profit in one year what you made in NTUC Income for 30 years. "

Just think. How does a life insurance company make its profits? Especially after they paid tens of millions in commission to its agents each year. Where does the money come from to pay the commission and the large profits?

Yes. It comes from the policyholders. The unsuspecting people who are told that life insurance is the best way to protect your family and to get your money back

This is a bad solution. This is why I try hard to pass the message to young Singaporeans. If you put your savings in the investment linked policies or other policies of these insurers, take a look at the benefit illustration. It will take you 15 years to break even, i.e. for the cash value to pay back the total premium that you have paid.

If you invest the same premium in an index fund, your savings is likely to grow by 50% AFTER ALLOWING FOR THE COST OF TERM INSURANCE.

Do you want your savings of $6,000 a year to reach $90,000 in 15 years (i.e. break even) or $135,000 (50% more)? The difference is $45,000.

Tips on buying insurance


Here are some tips about buying insurance ....

1. Buy insurance for the risks that have a severe impact that you or your family cannot bear. Do not buy insurance for small losses that you can afford to bear.

2. Make sure that you pay a fair rate of premium, relative to the expect cost of the loss, and are not overcharged.

Rule 1 means that you should insure the major risks, such as loss of life, property or car. You do not need to insure for small losses, such as $500 for the loss of a baggage, as you can afford to bear this loss on your own.

Rule 2 means that you do not pay $100 for a risk that should cost only $10. If you have a 0.1% chance of incurring a medical bill of $50,000, you should pay not  more than $100 (i.e. $50 for the expected loss and $50 for the expenses and profit of the insurance company). You should not, for example, pay $500 to cover this risk.

To apply rule 2, you have to find out what is charged by a few insurance company for the same risk. You have to find out for yourself.  You should not rely on the agent alone, as the agent want you to buy the policy recommended by him (for obvious reason).

You should never buy a product where it is difficult for you to understand and to compare. (Most people make this mistake. This is how the insurance company make so much profit).

Monday, March 18, 2013

Lost & Found Portal


I saw this poster at the bus stop opposite Thomson Plaza. The owner is offering a reward of $500 for the lost dog. The dog was lost in Yio Chu Kang, so the owner had to go quite far to put up this poster. 
I will be rebuilding the lost and found portal, to help people to post lost items online ...

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Managing risk and uncertainty

Michael Lee asked:
Mr Tan, wad do you mean by taking risk ? Wad kind of risk are you referring to?

REPLY
Risk means uncertainty. We have to accept some risk and have a sensible approach to manage risk. We cannot eliminate all risk and pay a lot of money to eliminate risk totally.

There is a 1 in 5 million chance of being killed on the road each day. One person die in a road accident. We accept this risk, and don't stay at home ...

There is a risk of being sued for defamation, especially by rich and powerful people. if we express our views. We still give our views and accept the risk.

There is a risk of being sued for copyright infringement if I copy an image from the internet. I accept the risk and see if anyone make a claim. So far, none.

If we invest in shares, there is a risk that it can go up or come down. We accept the risk. We don't just ask for "guarantee". People who want guarantee, end up losing all their money when they were misled. This happened with the mini-bond type of investments.

There is a risk of losing your baggage or missing your flight when you travel. You can accept the risk and avoid paying $30 for each trip. It is not worth buying insurance for small losses.

If you want to buy insurance, make sure you pay a fair price. If the insurance should cost $200, don't pay $2,000, just because the agent exaggerate the likelihood of the loss.

Seminar on Population White Paper


Transitioning.org is organising a seminar event focusing on the 6.9 million population white paper and other matters that affect Singaporeans. 
Date:     23 Mar (Sat)
Time:    2pm to 5pm
Venue: 
NVPC seminar room,
             6 Eu Tong Sen Street #04-88
             The Central Clarke Quay S(059817).



Update on Instant Car Pool

More information about the Instant Car Pool 

Demo site:

www.tklcloud.com/icp

Jakarta

http://tankinlian.com/admin/file.aspx?id=770&IID=777

Singapore

http://tankinlian.com/admin/file.aspx?id=769&IID=776

User Guide

http://tankinlian.com/admin/file.aspx?id=777&IID=784

Letter to LTA
http://tankinlian.com/admin/file.aspx?id=776&IID=783

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Malaysian General Election - 2013

Malaysia will hold its general election soon. If you like to follow the political developments in Malaysia, here are some news form the social media ....

THE 'DIRTY' 8? Rafizi challenges Najib to drop 8 senior Umno leaders from GE13 list
http://mybaru1.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-dirty-8-rafizi-challenges-najib-to.html

Pakatan offers to top civil service pay, perks promised by PM
http://mybaru1.blogspot.com/2013/03/pakatan-offers-to-top-civil-service-pay.html

Wong Tack to contest Bentong on DAP ticket
http://mybaru1.blogspot.com/2013/03/wong-tack-to-contest-bentong-on-dap.html

The Indians do have leverage
http://mybaru1.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-indians-do-have-leverage.html

Malaysia's U.S. Propaganda
http://mybaru1.blogspot.com/2013/03/malaysias-us-propaganda.html

FIRST SOLDIER KILLED: Najib blamed for "politicking" & not focusing on Sabah crisis as death toll climbs
http://mybaru1.blogspot.com/2013/03/first-soldier-killed-najib-blamed-for.html

Friday, March 15, 2013

FISCA Talk on Insurnce


egister now for the FISCA Talk on Insurance that will be held on Saturday, 30 March at 2 to 5 pm in Singapore Management University.
http://easyapps.sg/assn/Org/Event.aspx?id=5

This talk is held once in four months, so make it a point to attend.

Learn what are good insurance policies to buy, and what are bad policies to avoid. If you are unaware, you can end up losing several thousand dollars !!!!


Thursday, March 14, 2013

Treasure Singaporean professors



Dear Mr Tan
Referring to the recent case in which a NTU professor was denied tenure, and he may have to leave the job, I offer a perspective on why Singapore should treasure their own Singaporean professors.

Singapore is a country that is devoid of natural resources and is therefore highly dependent on human resource. To be admitted to a Singapore university and work as a professor requires highest qualification, such as PhD, and many years of training. Surely, they must be regarded as valuable human resource for Singapore.

At the same time, Singapore is a small country, and by simple logic, its local talent pool may also be small. Professors around the world compete with each other to gain international recognition. Indeed, it is not easy for Singapore professors or any professor to gain such recognition as they are competing with the best in the world. For Singaporean professors, such as Prof. Cherian George, who have gained international recognition, surely they must be regarded as local talent.

For universities in Singapore that are heavily subsidised with Singapore money, surely they must hire and retain Singaporeans as their professors so that the money is invested into the careers of Singaporeans.

At the end of the day, there aren't that many Singaporean professors. They are precious, treasure them!

Former Singaporean professor

Simplify sign-in for Wireless@SG


10 March 2013

Editor, Forum Page
Straits Times

It is heartening to hear that the Infocomm Development
Authority of Singapore (IDA) is doubling the bandwidth for the
Wireless@SG service.

I like to ask IDA to address another troublesome feature of
the current service. Currently, each provider uses its own
method to sign-in to the service. This is difficult, especially on 
a mobile phone. 

The workaround of downloading special script is also 
quite troublesome and frustrating.

I urge the IDA to provide a common sign in that can 
be used by all users, which does not have to depend on
the interface adopted by each provider.After sign-in, the 
user can be given an standard identification token to be 
passed to the hotspot provider

Let us make Wireless@SG really easy to use and put
Singapore in the frontline of innovation.

Hefty increase in premium for Incomeshield


Hi Mr Tan,
Could you please help to put on your blog my letter and further comments below:
I have written to STforum on thurday on the plain english and the increased premium of 40% amounting to about $400 per annum. Instead of publishing the letter, noted on the contrary, an entire page of advertisement promoting the plain enghlish. The points highlighted on deletion of clauses and restriction of claim (not to the benefit of policy owners) were not addressed in their advertisement.
There is a substantial increase of 40% in premium with additional coverage though CPF indicated only increase of $10 in premium for CPF integrated medilsheild. It translated to 40% increase of about $400 for my policy. I am not interested to have the additional coverage but would want affordable  insurance coverage as per existing policy to enable me to go over to private hospital for treatment if necessary. The queues after queues for treatement and payment due to the overcrowding in the hospitials, would end up in patients receiving delayed diagnosis and treatment.
I am sickened by the policy that affect me and decided by the govt, yet withoug any avenue to express my disagreement when I am the one who would be paying for the cost.
Thanks and regards,
Ms ling

--------------------------------------------------

9 March 2013

Editor
Forum Page
Straits Times

stforum@sph.com.sg

I personally delivered a letter to NTUC Income last December to ask about the revised
wording, supposedly to be in plain English, of the Incomeshield policy. I was quite unhappy
that some of the clauses on claims have been removed and other clauses have been
changed to be more restrictive.

I did not receive any reply for several weeks, in spite of several telephone calls to remind
them.

I had also received a letter dated 13 Feb 2013 from the Central Provident Fund informing
me that the additional premium based on the existing and new premium for the Med shield
has been increased by $10. Seeking clarification on this and earlier letter on plain English,
I called again. I insisted through my email to the NTUC contact centre again for a response
since there was no response since Dec 2012 to my queries. NTUC Income instead informed
me through email on 1st March 2013 that the premium for my existing policy would be
increased by $386 to $1,360 with the integration with med shield from 1 April 2013, a hefty
increase of nearly 40%

Is the Government monitoring this kind of increase? I had earlier moved to a private Shield
due to the over-crowding in public hospitals, but with the increase, it looks like I have to
move back to the basic Medishield plan.

Ms Ling Mee Choo

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Provide affordable flats


Printed in the Straits Times
I WELCOME the statement by National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan that he is looking to reduce the cost of new HDB flats by 30 per cent, with those in non-mature estates to cost about four years of one's salary ("New HDB flats to become cheaper"; last Saturday). I agree with this benchmark of affordability.
Mr Khaw has a difficult task of ensuring that the new pricing regime does not adversely affect the values of the HDB flats that were bought at higher prices in recent years.
I suggest the following measures to achieve the laudable goals:
- The new flats should be priced at a 30 per cent discount to current market prices.
- The owners who bought new flats under this pricing regime will be required to pay a levy of 30 per cent to the HDB when they sell their units in future. In essence, the HDB is a 30 per cent co-owner of these flats.
- The HDB should set up a portal for the sale and purchase of this category of flats, to ensure the transacted prices reflect the actual market value and are not manipulated to show lower prices.
Tan Kin Lian

Blog Archive