Many policyholders were affected by the missed projection under the AIA Critical Year policy. When they bought the policy long ago, they were told by the agent that they could stop paying premium after a certain number of years, called the "critical year". They were given a benefit illustration that showed the calculation. In some cases, the critical year looked "guaranteed" and contractual. In other cases, it was shown as being "projected". When the policy reached the critical year, they were told that the projection was not valid and they had to continue paying the premium for several more years.
Here is a letter sent by AIA to its policyholders to explain the situation.
I still get questions from the public asking if they have the right to sue AIA for the missed projection. It depends on the presentation of the benefit illustration at the point of sale.
Here is a statement from MAS Money Sense
http://www.moneysense.gov.sg/en/Understanding-Financial-Products/Insurance/Guides-and-Articles/Critical-Year-Feature.aspx
Statement for Life Insurance Association
http://www.lia.org.sg/node/1653
Here is a report of a legal suit taken by an AIA policyholder
http://www.reach.gov.sg/YourSay/DiscussionForum/tabid/101/mode/3/Default.aspx?ssFormAction=%5B%5BssBlogThread_VIEW%5D%5D&tid=%5B%5B8280%5D%5D
This report from CASE indicated that 110,000 people were affected. That is a very large number of people.
LESSON ON SIMILAR POLICIES SOLD TODAY
Here is a statement from MAS Money Sense
http://www.moneysense.gov.sg/en/Understanding-Financial-Products/Insurance/Guides-and-Articles/Critical-Year-Feature.aspx
Statement for Life Insurance Association
http://www.lia.org.sg/node/1653
Here is a report of a legal suit taken by an AIA policyholder
http://www.reach.gov.sg/YourSay/DiscussionForum/tabid/101/mode/3/Default.aspx?ssFormAction=%5B%5BssBlogThread_VIEW%5D%5D&tid=%5B%5B8280%5D%5D
This report from CASE indicated that 110,000 people were affected. That is a very large number of people.
LESSON ON SIMILAR POLICIES SOLD TODAY
I like to quote this example to warn consumers about the benefit illustration that are being issued today. I have seen some new policy plans that showed quite attractive maturity benefits, but a large portion of the projected values are "not guaranteed". Furthermore, the projected values were miserable for most of the duration, and were only adjusted sharply upwards during the last five years.
I do not know what is the basis for the sharp adjustment in these projected values, and if the insurance company decide not to honor the projection, e.g. by quoting difficult investment conditions, the policyholder will not have any recourse.
It is important for the consumers to be wary about these kind of projections, which do not have any sound basis, other than to show an attractive value at a remote date. If you receive a benefit illustration, take a look at the trend of the projected values. If you find that it increased sharply during the last five years, and are "not guaranteed", you should not believe it its sustainability!
3 comments:
I believe the non-guaranteed portion of the benefits illustration in any insurance policy should be just simply treated as what it says, "non-guaranteed". One should not bear any hope at all of receiving the "non-guaranteed" portion of any benefits of an insurance policy. Perhaps with this mentality, one will be more rational when assessing any insurance policy minus off the emotional hope element and marketing gimmicks displayed in the non-guaranteed portion of the benefits illustration in any insurance policy.
The objective is to cheat the customers into buying the policy so that the agents can get hefty commission and the company the sale. Did the company care? Don't tell me the company didn't know. This critical year cheat was going on for several years until some agents were bold enough to guarantee it in writing. The CEO didn't know? Who was he kidding? MAS should get hold of the chief for what happened...
When ntuc agents were promoting the buy one get one deal didn't the ceo know? Use the Revosave payouts to pay for the Vivolife policy.
When the Pru agents were promoting the "take the 10% profit from a single premium ILP investment every year to buy another regular ILP" didn't the CEO know?
These are other examples of scams to genarate commission for the agents and business for the companies. Everyone is happy except the customers who are blur and comatose to know what is going on.
Did MAS say customers can make informed decision? The truth is customers always kenna conned until they don't know by insurance conmen and conwomen.
This is the reason why ntuc reduced annual bonus so that they can play with the customers the 'non guaranteed. portion.This is the industry BEST practice and the best practice is like a 'cartel' to con the customers.
Well, they play the non guaranteed at the casino and if they win they can declare just enough and the rest goes into paying the ceo and the senior management performance bonus..
Post a Comment