http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_national_happiness
Quote:
Quote:
The assessment of gross national happiness (GNH) was designed in an attempt to measures quality of life or social progress in more holistic and psychological terms than only the economic indicator of gross domestic product (GDP).
The term "gross national happiness" was coined in 1972 by Bhutan's fourth Dragon King, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, who has opened Bhutan to the age of modernization soon after the demise of his father, Jigme Dorji Wangchuk. He used this phrase to signal his commitment to building an economy that would serve Bhutan's unique culture based on Buddhist spiritual values.
At first offered as a casual, offhand remark, the concept was taken seriously, as the Centre for Bhutan Studies, under the leadership of Karma Ura, developed a sophisticated survey instrument to measure the population's general level of well-being.
Two Canadians, Michael and Martha Pennock played a major role in developing the Bhutanese survey, which took a six to seven hour interview to complete. They developed a shorter international version of the survey which has been used in their home region of Victoria BC as well as in Brazil.
Like many psychological and social indicators, GNH is somewhat easier to state than to define with mathematical precision. Nonetheless, it serves as a unifying vision for Bhutan's five-year planning process and all the derived planning documents that guide the economic and development plans of the country.
At this level of generality, the concept of GNH is transcultural—a nation need not be Buddhist to value sustainable development, cultural integrity, ecosystem conservation, and good governance. Through collaboration with an international group of scholars and empirical researchers the Centre for Bhutan Studies further defined these four pillars with greater specificity into eight general contributors to happiness—physical, mental and spiritual health; time-balance; social and community vitality; cultural vitality; education; living standards; good governance; and ecological vitality.
Although the GNH framework reflects its Buddhist origins, it is solidly based upon the empirical research literature of happiness, positive psychology and well-being.The Bhutanese grounding in Buddhist ideals suggests that beneficial development of human society takes place when material and spiritual development occur side by side to complement and reinforce each other. The four pillars of GNH are the promotion of sustainable development, preservation and promotion of cultural values, conservation of the natural environment, and establishment of good governance.
Watch this 3 min video
Read this PDF.
Watch this 3 min video
Read this PDF.
4 comments:
I summarize the 8 contributors as follows - health, time, social, culture, education, living standard, governance, ecology.
The four pillars are sustainable development, cultural values, natural environment, good governance.
Singapore's ranking in this Happy Planet index is:
2006 49
2009 131
2012 > 50 (not shown)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Planet_Index
Here is another ranking, which shows Malaysia at 17, but no ranking for Singapore.
http://singaporemind.blogspot.sg/2009/10/gdp-vs-gnh-gross-national-happiness.html
This GNH framework is impressively comprehensive in nature, but its application in Singapore's context may meet one important obstacle, the religion factor.
Although the religious element is just a part of GNH Index, implementation is much easier if there is a National glue to solidly bind the people together first, thus a common religion could facilitate its application, even if society is not homogenous like Singapore.
Besides, for Singapore, the most important factor is the lack of "political will" to even consider or study it. WP's Slyvia Lim tried to bring this GNH in Parliament for debate, she was immediately shot down by a PAP bully.
For a materialistic Govt, money is King, no money no talk.
Post a Comment