Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Criticism of politicians

Dr. Mahathir explains why he will not sue the author of a book that criticises him. Read this article.

14 comments:

C H Yak said...

Dr M is more smarter and democratic in this respect.

Anonymous said...

Dr. M knows that, no longer PM, he will not get the preference treatment from the court.

Same with our old man. Just watch and see. He will stop suing when he is no longer MM or PM father.

Anonymous said...

Rex comments as follows,

The point of Dr M is that the law suit is meaningless and an act of cowardice.

Will one's reputation be enhanced after the court case? If the answer is NO, what is the purpose of suing someone who is alleged to tarnish one's reputation?

Therefore, to sue a party for tarnishing a perceived image
is a meaningless activity, particularly so if it is quite plain that one is not in dire straits and needing the money from the law suit.

I totally agree with Dr Mahatir that only cowards do such kind of meaningless activities.

rex

Anonymous said...

In SG, it is wiser to keep your mouth shut.

Tan Kin Lian said...

Dr. M said that the leader who sues critics is a coward. I would refer to him as a bully.

Anonymous said...

There are many wiser men than the man known as demi-god in sin.

Anonymous said...

After reading comments here, does it mean our local leaders who have been suing, especially suing foreign newspaper writers, are cowards or bullies.
It is more likely they are very thin-skinned and paranoid, or having an inferiority complex, forever having to look over their shoulders.

Anonymous said...

Rex comments on Jun 16 poster.

The answer is "all of the above".
coward + bully + thin skinned + paranoid + inferiority complex.

A truly wise and righteous person doesn't bother about such issues. Mahatir is a smart guy.

rex

Anonymous said...

I find Dr M not a reliable social commentator, he is to me a sour grape with little intergrity.

My reading of his comment is that obvioulsy there is some element of truth in that book, as such his sudden realisation of the need for 'freedom' of speech....is quite laughable!

On the other hand, initially I thought it was necessary for our leaders to challenge the defamation statements made by the foreign media essential to the well being of our country BUT I now believe they have overdone it with a hint to kill off All critism.

inspired byLKY said...

Absolutely concur with rex.

It is stooping even lower when the Law is manipulated shamelessly !

Anonymous said...

The purpose of suing is never about getting monetary compensation. Suing you and bankrupting you is a form of violence - financial violence - which is more effective than physical violence because the aim is to hurt you and even your loved ones, and in some case destroy you politically.

Anonymous said...

Many who know Dr M find him a 'hypocrite'. Others call him a 'cunning old man'. The former Prime Minister of Australia labels him a 'recalcitrant' person. He is smart but after 22 years of ruling by him, Malaysia is still a very corrupt nation and the crime rate is pretty high. Many Malaysians do not find it safe to live in their country. So what so great about Dr. M? It is NO LKY.

Anonymous said...

Dr Mahathir is no lky and that is exactly why the Doctor is respectable.

Anonymous said...

"During the 22 years when he retained a tight grip on power, Mahathir was hardly a friend of press freedom, outlawing various publications and ensuring that the mainstream media was effectively controlled by the state."

He has no locus standi to be critical.

It's like someone selling whole life policy all the while and when lost power, start peddling "buy term invest the rest"


Perhaps is due to mellowing or genuine change.
But we'll never know eh... pish posh

Blog Archive