Mr. Tan,
Can I have your comments about the decision of the insurer to reject certain types of treatment under an integrated Shield plan? See this report.
Is this fair, as the consumers has to pay a much higher premium to be covered under an integrated plan?
3 comments:
One thing that you cannot miss when you travel all over the world, is who owns billion-dollar buildings. The 2 most prominent ones are banks and insurance? What does this prove? Either
misleading selling or they win.
A man walks into a Parliament office and says to the receptionist,
"I would like to put my name forward for the forthcoming elections to
be a Greens M.P.
The receptionist replied, "Certainly sir. Please fill in this form.''
He was filling the form OK until he came to the question - ''Are you
circumcised?''
So he asked the receptionist, "Is this question necessary?"
She replied, "If you are circumcised you are not eligible."
He then asked, "What difference does it make if I am circumcised?"
She replied, "To become a Greens MP you have to be a complete dick."
Here is my encounter with a dubious ERA agent:-
For a new development under construction, the marketing agent told me the first one per cent (1%)
option fee had to be paid in cash, the following (2nd....3rd...) stage payments would have to be paid by
a combination of CPF and/or LOANS with the FINAL payment paid CASH. He knew that my loan
was only 45% (my name was on another property as a borrower, but not as not owner). We had
a lengthy discussion about the stage payments - as my cash was tied up in stocks and bonds
and it would take some time to liquidate it - and supposedly payment was needed immediately
as the development was more than half completed.
Also, as I am a high-income earner, I would be able to save up the CASH required for the
LAST payment. However, I was advised somewhat differently by the conveyancing lawyer
namely........FIRSTLY CASH payment, followed by CPF and/or cash payments, and only LASTLY
(the already) approved forty-five per cent (45%) LOAN.
Post a Comment