Saturday, August 15, 2009

Socialism

A reader commented that Tan Kin Lian is a socialist. I am more inclined to be a social democrat, along the lines of our national pledge to "build a democratic society based on equality and justice".

I have also run a cooperative enterprise for 30 years based on the principles of cooperation. I wish to share this explanation of socialism, which I found in Wikipedia.

Socialism refers to various theories of economic organization advocating state, public or common worker (through cooperatives) ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with an egalitarian method of compensation.

Modern socialism originated in the late 18th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticized the effects of industrialization and private ownership on society, however, socialism itself is not a political system; it is instead an economic system distinct from capitalism. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels used the terms "socialism" and "communism" interchangeably, and posited that it would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution.

Vladimir Lenin, perhaps influenced by Marx's ideas of "lower" and "upper" stages of socialism, later used the word "socialism" as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.

Early socialist thinkers tended to favor an authentic meritocracy combined with rational social planning, while many modern socialists have a more egalitarian approach.

Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital, creates an unequal society, does not provide equal opportunities for everyone to maximize their potentialities and does not utilize technology and resources to their maximum potential nor in the interests of the public. Therefore socialists advocate the creation of a society that allows for the widespread application of modern technology to rationalize the economy by eliminating the anarchy in production of capitalism, allowing for wealth and power to be distributed more evenly based on the amount of work expended in production, although there is considerable disagreement among socialists over how and to what extent this could be achieved.

Socialism is not a concrete philosophy of fixed doctrine and program; its branches advocate a degree of social interventionism and economic rationalization, usually in the form of economic planning, sometimes opposing each other. Another dividing feature of the socialist movement is the split between reformists and the revolutionaries on how a socialist economy should be established. Some socialists advocate complete nationalization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange; others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy.

Social democrats propose selective nationalization of key national industries in mixed economies, while maintaining private ownership of capital and private business enterprise. Social democrats also promote tax-funded welfare programs and regulation of markets. Many social democrats, particularly in European welfare states, refer to themselves as "socialists", introducing a degree of ambiguity to the understanding of what the term means.


Tan Kin Lian

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

At company level, ntuc ubder your leadership started on a socialist platform which provided equal distribution of wealth , equal opportunity,
social responsibility , win-win partnership between customers and sseller. All tghis is gone. Now wealth is concentrated on a few and they are getting greedier and dishonest. They dump useless products on their trusting customers and robbing them without their knowing it. They lie and con and tell half truth. They have become capitalistic.
They have indulged in posh partying, squander the orphaned money, buy expensive chairs, give themselves fancifool titles, pay themselves high salaries, con their customers by making them buy useless products .They then splurged their ill gooten money on expensive trappings and dress up like illiterate intellectuals or pigs walking on 2 legs. This is the revolution from socialist cooperatives to capitalistic tyrannism or showism.

Tan Kin Lian said...

Many people associate Socialism with the Soviet Union. The failure of USSR is not due to Socialism, but to Dictatorship.

Many countries in Europe follow Democratic Socialist principles, and they make good progress in delivering a good quality of life to the people.

Their economic growth may not be the highest, but they are fairer in their distribution of wealth and raising living standards for the people at large (and not only the top people).

Anonymous said...

Sorry Mr.Tan for calling you a socialist.

I think Singapore is not really appropriate for too much socialism.

Mui Mui

Blog Archive